The Convenience Theorem™

A groundbreaking economic framework for understanding and pricing convenience in markets

Developed by Dillan Mori and Michael Chase, this theorem establishes that products offering superior convenience should optimize their pricing strategy based on quantifiable convenience value delivered to consumers.

Vending Machine
$2.50
vs
Gas Station (10 min away)
$1.75

Key Concepts

The Convenience Theorem

Products offering superior convenience relative to alternatives should be priced to reflect the quantifiable value of that convenience to consumers.

Premium-to-Convenience Ratio

A psychology-informed metric (PCR) that evaluates pricing decisions by comparing premiums to convenience value, with hard caps based on consumer acceptance limits: PCR = Premium ÷ Convenience Value

Convenience Value Formula

CV = Distance Saved + Time Saved + Effort Reduced + Risk Avoided + Brand Preference

Base convenience value from the four core factors plus brand/quality preference adjustment

Understanding the Convenience Theorem

The Theorem Statement

"A business offering superior convenience relative to competitors should optimize its Premium-to-Convenience Ratio (PCR) to maximize value capture from the quantifiable convenience it provides. Optimal pricing occurs when the convenience premium or discount (price difference relative to alternatives) reflects the full economic value delivered through distance saved, time saved, effort reduced, and risk avoided, while accounting for competitive positioning and brand loyalty factors."

The Mathematical Framework

The Convenience Theorem uses a sophisticated mathematical model to accurately value convenience across all product price ranges.

Complete Formula

PCR = Premium ÷ (Base CV × √(Price/Industry_Baseline))

Where convenience value is magnified based on industry-specific product importance. Final pricing recommendations respect hard psychological premium caps based on consumer research. Results are compared against optimal PCR ranges derived from real market data including competition levels, price elasticity, and profit margins.

Premium: Convenient Price - Alternative Price
Base CV: Distance + Time + Effort + Risk + Brand Preference (intelligently scaled)
Industry Magnification: √(Alternative Price ÷ Industry Baseline) scaling factor
Psychological Premium Caps: Hard dollar limits based on consumer research and price ranges
Optimal PCR Target: Industry-specific ideal range based on market factors

Real-World Applications

Retail Pricing

Optimize pricing strategies for convenient locations like airport shops, vending machines, and convenience stores.

Location Analysis

Evaluate the economic value of different business locations and justify rent premiums.

Consumer Decisions

Help consumers make rational choices by quantifying the value of convenience they receive.

Market Research

Analyze competitor pricing strategies and identify market opportunities.

Convenience Pricing Strategy Calculator

Analyze your pricing strategy using Premium-to-Convenience Ratio (PCR)

Industry
Product
Convenience
Customer
1

What industry is your business in?

Select your industry to get market-specific pricing benchmarks
2

What product are you pricing?

3

What convenience do you provide customers?

How far customers travel to reach competitor vs. your location
Total time your customers save by choosing your location
Value customers place on avoiding parking, walking, waiting at competitor
Value customers place on avoiding weather, security, safety risks

Brand & Quality Preference

Customers Prefer Competitor Equal Quality Customers Prefer Your Brand
$0.00 Customers view both brands equally
Adjust based on your target customers' brand/quality preferences (scales with product price: -100% = customers strongly prefer competitor, +100% = customers strongly prefer your brand)
4

Your target customer profile

Not their wage, but what they'd pay to save an hour (students: $10-20, working adults: $25-50)
What your customers value driving costs at (IRS standard: $0.65/mile)

Quick Examples

See the Convenience Theorem in action

Airport Water Bottle

$4.00 vs $1.50 outside (Premium: $2.50)

Convenience value: $45+ from time & security savings

PCR: 0.055 - Excellent Value

Highway Gas Station

$3.85/gal vs $3.45/gal in town (Premium: $0.40)

Convenience value: $12+ from driving savings

PCR: 0.032 - Excellent Value

Office Building Coffee

$5.50 vs $4.25 across street (Premium: $1.25)

Convenience value: $8+ from time & weather savings

PCR: 0.150 - Good Value

About the Developers

Dillan Mori

Dillan Mori

Co-Developer

Co-owner of SouthVend Vending Company and Master of Science in Finance student at the University of Notre Dame, graduating May 2026. Received a well-rounded undergraduate degree from Holy Cross College. Co-developer of the Convenience Theorem and contributed to the mathematical formalization and practical applications of convenience valuation in economic theory.

Michael Chase

Michael Chase

Co-Developer

Co-owner of SouthVend Vending Company and Business Analytics student at the University of Notre Dame. Received a well-rounded undergraduate degree from Holy Cross College. Co-developer of the Convenience Theorem and contributed to the mathematical formalization and practical applications of convenience valuation in economic theory.

Development Background

The Convenience Theorem emerged from observations about pricing inconsistencies in convenience-based markets. Mori and Chase recognized that while spatial economics had established the importance of location in pricing, there was no standardized framework for quantifying and pricing convenience across different dimensions.

Their work builds upon established economic theories including Hotelling's spatial competition model, but introduces a novel quantitative approach to measuring convenience value through multiple factors: distance, time, effort, and risk avoidance.

Related Economic Literature

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41-57.
  • Eaton, B.C. & Tweedle, J. (2012). A Hotelling style model of spatial competition for a convenience good.
  • Copeland, M.T. (1923). Relation of consumers' buying habits to marketing methods.

Share This Theory

Help spread awareness of the Convenience Theorem and its practical applications.